15 Apr
2009
15 Apr
'09
6:12 p.m.
Hi, On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:59:32PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
The current policy requires announcement of the aggregate, but does not forbid announcements of more-specifics.
Announcing the aggregate falls down in the "disconnected networks" case, though.
Whether or not more-specifics *work*, as in "all important peers accept your routes", is not something the APWG can decide.
There's not even a guarantee that a /32 (or more that one, fwiw) are going to be accepted. Who knows what people put in their filters? Regards, Sascha Luck