On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jasper Jans <Jasper.Jans@espritxb.nl> wrote:

I am all for learning from our mistakes - but we cannot deploy policy that excludes a group of people
when it comes to IPv6 that already qualified for ipv4 PI. If we really have to do the dual-homing
requirement (I'm of the opinion we don't)

then at the very least make it so that the clause states
that you need to be dual-homed for any new IPv6 PI, or must already own IPv4 PI. This way you can
prevent people from getting it that do not have it yet but allow the ones that already run IPv4 PI to
get IPv6 PI.

Jasper

This is an argument what many people might support -- even me ;-) , --- but I would also add some review period to all PI allocations. Like this:

The policy allowing Provider Independent allocation might be revoked later on and if it is revoked then ALL PI holder not fullfilling the new policy will be requested to return their PI address space and renumber to PA address space within 2 years.

What do you think about this?

Thanks,

Géza