On fre, mai 20, 2011 12:11, Emilio Madaio wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-509, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
Hmm are we really sure we want to have this part in here? "This section only applies to address space that is returned to the RIPE NCC and that will not be returned to the IANA but re-issued by the RIPE NCC itself." I do see the point of it yes, but what if a huge block are returned, one that could go back to IANA and be reused for something that all can benefit from? ... and we have no idea what it can be since we can't predict the future. Do we change the policy again at that point or when thing change? other than that, support this policy. It do make it pretty clear on how IPv4 are handled in the near-comming future. -- --- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger@jorgensen.no | - The Future is IPv6 ------------------------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?