Hello,

Do we really want do block new organisations with new allocations, but
allow old (happy) one to do anything with addresses tehy have...? That's
not fair.

There're organisations, which have large allocations and they're
sometimes not taking care - they have enough IPv4 addresses, nothing is
pushing them to implement IPv6, or save address space by implementation
of some NAT solution. If they decide to sell their business, policy will
allow that - but, if "new" resource holder will try similar thing,
policy will ban then?

My point is simple - there should be ONLY ONE POLICY - independent on
time of allocation. Such policy must limit not only new LIRs (using
addresses from last /8), but also old LIRs holding addresses from old
allocations.

And if we really want to reclaim some address space, we should review
current allocations - in terms of current situation in IPv4 world.