11 Jun
2004
11 Jun
'04
4:38 p.m.
On 11 Jun, 2004, at 16:19, Randy Bush wrote:
Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they want to anycast?
i think the point intended is that the address space *must* be used for anycast, and not just another address grab. yes?
Well, no one doubts that is the intention here, that is why I suggested a different wording earlier, so the motivation is clear. My question is, why limit it to anycast one of the servers? Joao