On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 10:03, Tore Anderson wrote:
b. treat all addressing space available for allocation as a single pool B. KISS.
2. Conditions for allocation the first /22. Maintain the status quo.
Point taken.
3. Further allocation(s) (after the first /22) None of the above. My preference is to maintain the status quo - no additional allocations. I do not quite see why we should change the «last /8» policy which in my view has been quite successful (except for the abuse that 2015-01 hopefully helps shut down).
If it ain't broke, don't fix it?
Unless we interpret «broke» to mean «exhausted». If so, c'est la vie.
I take "broken" as "painful and far enough from exhaustion", so in need of a fix. Reminder, we are 3 years (precisely) into the "last /8 IPocalypse", and RIPE still has more than 0.98 of a /8 available (more likely 0.99).