But Niall, I have to admit that these two statement at point 5.3 confuses me a bit: [...] 5.3 Address Recycling Any address space that is returned to the RIPE NCC will be covered by the same rules as the address space intended in section 5.1. This section only applies to address space that is returned to the RIPE NCC and that will not be returned to the IANA but re-issued by the RIPE NCC itself. [...] sorry but maybe this feeds the confusion about last /8 appling only to 185/8 or the whole RIPE available pool thank you for you opinion Riccardo Il 20/04/2016 12:50, Niall O'Reilly ha scritto:
On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:53, Riccardo Gori wrote:
Andrea, can you help me understand what happened to available pool is any when 185/8 was reiceved by IANA?
I think this may be the wrong question.
IIRC, the triggering of the "last /8" policy (as it has usually been known) did not coincide with receipt of 185/8 from (NB: not "by") IANA by RIPE NCC, but rather with the first allocation by RIPE NCC from 185/8.
As Roger Jørgensen has explained, once the policy was triggered, it was to apply to all subsequent allocations.
Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
-- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori@wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info@wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) --------------------------------------------------------------------
