I also agree with MarcoH Regards, Ralph Smit. -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Marco Hogewoning Sent: dinsdag 10 februari 2009 14:19 To: Gert Doering Cc: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations) On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote:
What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind about is:
- do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).
- do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round of discussion/review phase".
Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long. Groet, MarcoH