Hello James,
Speeking about concensus is definitely wrong.
I'll send a longer critical aanlyses later,
Best,
Géza
Hi all,
It seems that the consensus is that up to a /29 is the right amount of
space for the majority of networks, if that is the case I've think we
should add the following:
==
5.1.x
Organisations that have already received their initial allocations are
able to request additional address space up to a /29 without supplying
of further documentation as if they were a first time requestor.
==
The logic being that this solves the problem for networks who deployed
before this change and avoids the issues with HD ratio (which I think
needs some looking at, but not here)
J
--
James Blessing
07989 039 476