20 Oct
2015
20 Oct
'15
5:04 p.m.
Of course, if you accept 2015-01 to prevent depletion and then 2015-05. 2015-10-20 18:00 GMT+03:00 "Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB" <tom@kebab.org.pl>:
W dniu 2015-10-20 o 16:56, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze:
Dear, all.
I think it will be rightly to make progressive allocating depend on current resource number and age of the LIR.
E.g. LIR has /16 - he can ask /16 or equivalent Or First 18 months - /22, second 18 months months - /21, third 18 months - /20 etc.
I think it will supplement 2015-01 very good.
Do you think, that the remaining space from last /8 is made of rubber?
-- Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet
-- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29