Hi, I support this policy proposal. That being said, I do not understand why is this policy proposal making a difference between IPv6 PA and IPv6 PI assignments. I would say that someone can request the last /22 if they have an IPv6 block registered on their name - be it an allocation (ALLOCATED-BY-RIR), a sub-allocation (ALLOCATED-BY-LIR), using an aggregated block (AGGREGATED-BY-LIR) or an IPv6 PI or PA assignment. Regards, Elvis On 05/05/14 15:17, Marco Schmidt wrote:
Dear colleagues,
A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-606, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-04
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 3 June 2014.
Regards
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC
-- <http://v4escrow.net> Elvis Daniel Velea Chief Business Analyst Email: elvis@V4Escrow.net <mailto:elvis@v4escrow.net> US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914 EU Phone: +3 (161) 458 1914 Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited.
