Hi, On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
I don't support the approval of 2013-03 "No need" at this time.
While you're free to do so, I'm just so slightly annoyed that you're doing this *again* - wait until the very last second, and then state fundamental objections. Generally speaking, this sort of blunt "the fundamental principle is wrong" statement of opposition at the very end of the review phase is wasting lots of effort that has gone into making the policy text, creating the impact analysis (lots of time spent at the NCC), and in the preceding discussions. Fundamental opposition really should be voiced in the intitial phase of a proposal, where we try to find common ground to then build the specific text that is then evaluated for the impact analysis. (Technically speaking, your opposition was actually voiced *after the end* of the review phase - which was on July 30. But since we intended to extend the review phase anyway, based on the ongoing discussion, this point is somewhat moot) Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279