Hi, On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:52:41PM +0200, Mark Scholten wrote:
The current options we have to implement IPv6 prevent us from implementing it. There are multiple problems we see currently: - We probably won't get PI IPv6 space
Where do you see the hurdle?
- With IPv6 we would like to offer a client (collocation) at least a /112 (with PI this isn't allowed if I'm correctly informed)
This is the "datacenter" / "hosting shop" case I mentioned, and this definitely needs clarification what the community views as useful here. (Note that you can't do this with IPv4 PI either, giving customers in your colocation space a, say, /29 from your IPv4 PI range)
- PA IPv6 address space is currently not available for us (this also prevents us to implement IPv6)
You *could* become a LIR... which would make IPv6 PA space available very easily.
We also know some networks (with AS number) that currently use IPv4 PI and don't are a LIR (and don't use IPv4 PA). They also need a solution for the mentioned problems before they could implement IPv6.
I'm not sure I understand why they wouldn't be able to use IPv6 PI...? Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 150584 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279