I support Thor-Henrik views and opinions. Regards, Fernando El 27/04/2006, a las 10:48, Thor-Henrik Kvandahl escribió:
Hi all,
here are my *personal* opinion on this proposal.
I do not support this proposal, and my reasons for this are:
* This proposal increases the rate of consumption of IPv4. * It favourises the large ISPs. * In the presentation on RIPE 52, Tuesday by Filiz Yilmaz, we where told that this proposal was abandoned by ARIN and APNIC, and one representative from LacNIC also stood up and expressed their conserns. I have not heard anything from AfriNIC, but I cannot see why they would want to implement this policy. I feel if will be arrogant of the RIPE community to disregard the other RIRs conserns and implement this policy.
And I also have to agree with Gert Doering who said in the address policy WG that there has been very quiet around this proposal, and that the reason for this can be that ETNO claims thay "unanimously support this proposal".
-- Thor-Henrik Kvandahl no.telenor
------------------------------------------------ Fernando Garcia |Tel: +34 91 4359687 EUROCOMERCIAL I&C SA |Fax: +34 91 4313240 Valentín Beato, 5 |e-mail: fgarcia@eurocomercial.es E-28037 Madrid | Spain |http://www.eurocomercial.es