Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

These would be correct if applied to End Users, unfortunately your proposition is applying to LIRs.

So as I understand it, 2016-03 results in making a LIR's dimension void, e.g. to assimilate a LIR to an End User.

So I oppose this proposal.

I fully agree with you but it seems some think that prefixes from last-/8 is not intended to be used and distributed as we used to. Which I can comprehend, because as LIR we need to understand and make our end-users understand there is no IPv4 available anymore. Is there an official statement on this point ? Can LIR from the last-/8 distribute addresses to customers or only use it on CGN ?