14 Nov
2011
14 Nov
'11
4:15 p.m.
I agree. On 14 nov. 2011, at 11:13, James Blessing wrote:
It seems that the consensus is that up to a /29 is the right amount of space for the majority of networks, if that is the case I've think we should add the following:
==
5.1.x
Organisations that have already received their initial allocations are able to request additional address space up to a /29 without supplying of further documentation as if they were a first time requestor.
==
The logic being that this solves the problem for networks who deployed before this change and avoids the issues with HD ratio (which I think needs some looking at, but not here)
Sound reasoning! Kind regards, Job