I am the Co-Chair of the Charging Scheme Task Force, and will speak on our behalf. This is a topic that we are well aware of, and will keep an eye on. Any of our recommendations will consider standard allocation sizes and historical guidelines from the RIPE community and RIPE NCC. -peter On 2024 Oct 18 (Fri) at 17:24:17 +0200 (+0200), Patrick Velder wrote: :So everyone gets a /28 and then the new billing scheme comes out and charges :based on IPv6 usage starting from /32 (small) to /29 (medium) to /28 (xtra :large)? 😂 : :On 14.10.24 15:18, Angela Dall'Ara wrote: :> Dear colleagues, :> :> A new RIPE Policy Proposal, 2024-02, "IPv6 Initial Allocations /28" is :> now available for discussion. :> :> This proposal aims to change the initial IPv6 allocation size from /29 to :> /28. :> :> You can find the full proposal at: :> https://www.ripe.net/community/policies/proposals/2024-02 :> :> As per the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP), the purpose of the :> Discussion Phase is to discuss the proposal and provide feedback to the :> proposer. :> :> At the end of the Discussion Phase, the proposers, with the agreement of :> the WG Chairs, will decide how to proceed with the proposal. :> :> The PDP document can be found at: :> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-781 :> :> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to :> address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 12 November 2024. :> :> :> Kind regards, :> Angela Dall'Ara :> Policy Officer :> RIPE NCC