On 22 May 2012 15:18, Pascal Gloor <pascal.gloor@finecom.ch> wrote:
Really, isn't CATV a closed access network that you have control off? Could you do 6to4 (or something similar) at the border if you need to access v4 content? Or have I misunderstood what you are doing?
6to4 is IPv6 tunnel over IPv4, not the other way around, what you mean is DNS46/NAT46 which is outdated, maybe 6rd or MAP46 (which is not yet really available).
My bad, I was thinking Stateless NAT64 (aka SIIT)
But that's not the point. My point is about post-v4-exhaustion policy, not about transition technologies, nor about lack of v4. It's about keeping the customer assigned v4 space (and not even the IPs, just the assignment size).
but why are you trying to keep it on IPv4 and not moving to v6 J -- James Blessing 07989 039 476