5 May
2014
5 May
'14
9:08 p.m.
Hi Jan,
Historically it was put in there as an encouragement for "last /8" LIRs to "do something with IPv6"...
I know that, but that's not quite what I meant.
What I meant is that I don't see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is there, but that the current document didn't already have IPv6 PI as a valid requirement.
Not either-or.
I first thought that the last /8 policy was written before IPv6 PI for LIRs became possible, so I checked: - IPv6 PI for LIRS was 2009-08 (concluded in 2009) - Last /8 was 2010-02 Seems I was wrong. IPv6 PI for LIRs did exist at the time that the last /8 policy was written. I think at the time we just didn't even consider LIRs that didn't want/need IPv6 PA space. Cheers, Sander