On 2 dec 2009, at 08:49, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
Let's not forget that I will probably announce my 6rd as more specifics to aid in load balancing traffic just as I do with my multiple IPv4 allocations. So routing table times 8 I guess, if we're lucky.
I still find this a really bad idea, like Remco says everybody just happens to have plans for 6rd so if they please can get a /24, we might as well make it the default allocation size so people don't have to lie, uhhh be optismistic, about it.
If we have separate space for /24 allocation policy then at least I can filter the de-aggregation and stop some of the madness.
Yeah and please make it a seperate policy then with hard words on actual deployment, you get the /24 and have 12 months to show up in google's statistics or you need to give it back. The same as some countries did with UMTS frequencies: use it or loose it. MarcoH