Hi, I'm against this proposal. It seems that economic interests are the main reason for that. From my personal point of view: with IPv6 there is a good replacement solution to connect network devices. So there is no need to offer IPv4 addresses in a larger amount from the RIR. Best, Carsten -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Marco Schmidt Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 14:47 An: address-policy-wg@ripe.net Betreff: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria) Dear colleagues, A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria", is now available for discussion. The goal of this proposal is to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 IPv4 allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. You can find the full proposal at: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 18 November 2015. Regards Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC