And while you're at it, have them update the Sipura-owned-by-Linksys-owned-by-Cisco gear too, as those often contain routers too, and IPv6 support will end a lot of NAT headaches. -----Original Message----- From: arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net] On Behalf Of Ted Mittelstaedt Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:25 PM To: Eliot Lear Cc: ppml@arin.net; address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space Eliot Lear wrote:
On 7/22/09 11:50 PM, michael.dillon@bt.com wrote:
How cheap do IPv4 addresses need to be to make it worthwhile for an equipment vendor to buy up addresses today to drive up the price and make it worthwhile for the market to buy carrier grade NAT boxes?
If you attend next week's IETF in Sweden, you will see quite a number of Cisco employees involved in nearly every aspect of IPv6, including transition technologies. We are there because we continue to believe that there is no Plan B(*), that IPv6 is the best way for the Internet
to grow.
Tell your coworkers that until Linksys-owned-by-Cisco gear gets IPv6 buttons in it, IPv6 ain't a real thing to any org under 50 employees. The RVS4000 is a good first step - now, let's extend that code to the rest of the Linksys product line. You don't want to be embarrassed by DD-WRT, after all, do you? Ted _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.