5 May
2014
5 May
'14
7:40 p.m.
Hi, I support the proposal. I'll agree with the previous about the distinction between PI and PA. In my mind both were valid in order to get the last /22.. Regards, George On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-606, "IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now available for discussion.
You can find the full proposal at:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-04
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 3 June 2014.
Regards
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC