Re: [address-policy-wg] Comment on 2006-05 (PI Assignment Size)

Hi,

I support the 2006-05 proposal. We have one client who insisted on getting PI space, but they qualified for at most /27. Then we had to actually request that /27 and have them expierience what prefix filtering does to small PI networks.

I'm a bit afraid of mixing RIPE address policy interests/requirements and routing policy interests/requirements. Ofcourse a lot of address space is requested to be routed, so there is a connection between the two. I'm just afraid that common routing policies will change if we change the address policy, so then we'll have to change the address policy again, which will lead to changes in common routing policy, etc.. We have to be careful here. Sander