On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Arash Naderpour <arash_mpc@parsun.com> wrote:
This proposal actually will only disadvantage "young LIRs" if they want to do stuff with their /22 that is frowned upon by the community - namely, trade, instead of "use for customers".
That's not true, it can affect any holder of /22 from 185/8
Can you please stop writing that? It is not about 185/8. It's about all allocations made after a certain point in time.
not only "young LIRs". Even if it was limited to "young LIRs" it was not acceptable to me as they need to be treated same as "old LIRs", These who become a member earlier already have enough advantage over the newer ones, and this policy grant them more and I cannot agree with that.
I really cannot see how that is true. The policy proposal provides new LIRs with better protection from "shark" LIRs who don't want to run businesses with their allocated space. The proposal is all about protecting new LIRs who actually will do assignments with their allocated space. I do agree, though, with the repeated criticism about how M&A is handled. -- Jan