22 May
2016
22 May
'16
11:33 a.m.
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
New LIRs - holders of /22 - have all the incentives to deploy IPv6 already (because they do not have enough IPv4 to number everything with public v4 addresses) - but how would such a policy incentivize a big content provider that has enough v4, is not growing in number of external visible services (= doesn't need more v4 addresses), and has no v6?
These are the sore spots today: content and cloud providers - and neither are likely to fall under this policy.
Thank you, Gert, for this very concise summary of the major grief that cannot and will not be solved, neither by 2015-05 nor by 2016-03. -- Jan