Hi, just to point something out: On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:16:51PM -0700, Greg L. wrote:
ccTLD service should be NOT the only exception to get /24 PI for anycast DNS, the policy should be open for any business entity that can demonstrate the need for /24 PI DNS anycast allocation and 2+ disperse locations where this prefix is announced.
So far, I have seen *one* entity speak up and say "we want to do DNS anycast, and we're not a ccTLD operator". So there's certainly not overwhelming demand (yet?). Argueing on behalf of not-so-well defined others isn't too helpful in policy development... Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279