Hi James, (just doing some cleanup here) I don't think there's going to be a clash between this and a special resources for IXes proposal (although it's hard to be sure since it hasn't been published yet :) I would suggest that if a proposal to that extent is going to be put forward, it will be done quickly, and keeps the final /8 pool in mind. This proposal merely clarifies which space belongs in that pool. Best, Remco van Mook Director of Interconnection, Europe remco.vanmook@eu.equinix.com +31 61 135 6365 MOB EQUINIX 51-53 Great Marlborough Street London, W1F 7JT, United Kingdom On 13-07-11 10:40, "boggits" <boggits@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 July 2011 09:34, Emilio Madaio <emadaio@ripe.net> wrote:
The draft document for the proposal described in 2011-03 has been published. The Impact Analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
I support this proposal with no changes, the only caveat is whether the special resources for IXs proposal and this clash and there should be some mention of this...
J
--
James Blessing 07989 039 476
This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, 4 Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales, No. 6293383.