Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

W dniu 2015-10-20 o 16:56, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze:

Dear, all.

I think it will be rightly to make progressive allocating depend on current resource number and age of the LIR.

E.g. LIR has /16 - he can ask /16 or equivalent Or First 18 months - /22, second 18 months months - /21, third 18 months - /20 etc.

I think it will supplement 2015-01 very good.

Do you think, that the remaining space from last /8 is made of rubber? -- Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet