Hi Wilfried, On 5 Feb 2010, at 6:35, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: [...]
thanks for the detailed analysis and comments!
Looking at the framework within this exercise is meant to happen, I have the strong opinion that the proposed changes, clarifications and additions (and some more that c|should be incorporated, as well) do not fit within the "editorial changes", "clarification of language" constraints.
My feeling is that the changes should either be strictly limited to those obviously covered by the "editorial changes/clarification" headlines or we should rather take this as an opportunity to really bring this policy up-to-date.
I can understand the need to clarify ambiguities through the regular process if they cannot be included in this update to the document. I would request, though, that the RIPE NCC publish a statement on its web site of how it currently interprets the policy where it is not explicitly clear. Kind regards, Leo Vegoda