20 Jun
2016
20 Jun
'16
11:30 a.m.
On 20 Jun 2016, at 09:04, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
But I'm close to giving up on this and calling a ban on further changes to the IPv4 policy
+1
- the "new LIR" folks here are accting in a fairly irresponsible way regarding *future* participants, while at the same time complaining that they are treated unfairly by the old LIRs - totally ignoring the fact that *without the foresight of these old LIRs* you wouldn't have any space at all today.
Indeed. The irony of this is completely lost on these "new LIR” folks”. A possible compromise might be a requirement for future IPv4 policy proposals to show that they do not disadvantage future participants or increase the burn rate of the remaining IPv4 pool. Same thing really.