Hi André,
On 09.07.2015 14:19, Marco Schmidt wrote:
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 7 August 2015.
tl;dr: I support the proposal in the current state.
I do not really think this will help the routing table growth as outlined in section B of the impact analysis though. The organisations that are likely to request address space under the proposed rules will probably announce the received address space with some sort of de-aggregation.
But I do think this proposal can remove constraints some organisation currently have when deploying (or trying to deploy) IPv6.
I have already been thinking about the de-aggregation, and especially for national networks I think there are ways to keep that under control. But that's not really address policy related. I'll take it to our Routing WG. Cheers, Sander