Hi, On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 02:41:05PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
Not sure about the history, but the current version of this "loophole" is quite narrowly defined in the current policy (section 6.2):
«IP addresses used solely for the connection of an End User to a service provider (e.g. point-to-point links) are considered part of the service provider's infrastructure.»
While it does not differentiate between dynamic and static assignments, do note the use of work «solely».
Indeed. That's the thing, p2p links, which ended up being "okayish" for "end user get a single /32, on the link, and nothing more". [..]
For IPv6 we use AGGREGATED-BY-LIR for these ranges, and would be nice to be able to ("legally") do something similar for IPv4.
I'd say "at least two members of the WG see this as a valid problem statement, so a policy proposal might be called for" :-) (The "should we have competing proposals for the same document active at the same time" discussion is left to the WG chairs, of course) Gert Doering -- LIR admin -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279