Hello, we face the same problem. We are a small internet access provider in France. We provide internet in residential areas, and our customers currently use less than one IPv4 address per home. We do not want to assign a /48 to all our customers only to meet RIPE's criteria. We prefer using only a /32 for each of our broadband access server, and /48 only for customers asking for it (ie : customers who have a router, several subnets, ...). Bertrand Maujean Jon Lawrence a écrit :
On Thursday 17 June 2004 10:20, Pekka Savola wrote:
I saw that -- but I don't see *any* justification for this interpretation. Remember, the goal is to require 200 assignments to *other* organizations, not be satisfied that you can make 200 assignemnts to your internal network, or 100 assignments to your internal network and 100 to other organizations!
And this is part of the problem. We won't be rolling IPv6 out ot 200 customers any time soon. So we can't get an allocation. Thus we can't run trials with IPv6. I really fail to see the reason behind the 200 other organisation rule - perhaps somee one would like to explain the logic.
Jon
-- Bertrand Maujean, responsable Informatique & Telecoms SEM Cable de l'Est - www.semnet.tm.fr 254 rue de la gare, 54710 Ludres - 03 83 25 97 82