5 May
2014
5 May
'14
8:43 p.m.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On one hand, I don't quite see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is there, and therefore it seems obvious that having IPv6 PI should be a valid requirement as well.
Historically it was put in there as an encouragement for "last /8" LIRs to "do something with IPv6"...
I know that, but that's not quite what I meant. What I meant is that I don't see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is there, but that the current document didn't already have IPv6 PI as a valid requirement. Not either-or. -- Jan