Hi, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:54:42PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
I don???t think reaching consensus in the PI/PA change will be so easy in the ???near future??? (considering that it may require a long implementation time), and a middle way proposal looks feasible to me.
but it's not a middle way: it's removing the block on sub-assigning to other parties, which is the thing that distinguishes PI from PA.
Which is one of the things. Other things are "how big will that bag of numbers be" and "what costs are attached to it". Especially the "how big will that bag of numbers be" will certainly be something we'll have to discuss next, shall we decide to open up PI for "more liberate use" (like, will "I want to assing a million /64 to DSL users" be a sufficient reason to get "larger than a /48"?). Consequences to all we do... Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279