Hi Gert, I don't see it as a major problem even though I would like to support this policy change, in the sake of equality when handling resources. Best Regards, Martin Hunek Dne pondělí 19. března 2018 17:47:42 CET, Gert Doering napsal(a):
Dear AP WG,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:34:25PM +0100, Marco Schmidt wrote:
A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2018-01, "Organisation-LIR Clarification in IPv6 Policy" is now available for discussion. This policy proposal was prompted by the discussion at the last RIPE meeting, where the NCC brought up the issue that the IPv6 allocation policy talks about "organization" without ever defining what that is - "one LIR account", "one legal organization" (which can hold multiple LIR accounts), etc.
Jordi volunteered to clean up the text, and here's the proposed changes - but without some feedback from *you*, we can't clean this up.
[..]
We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg@ripe.net> before 23 March 2018. Thus: feedback please.
Like
- "the text matches the original intent as I have always understood the policy, and we should go there" - "this is not my understanding of the original policy, because ..." - "never touch a working policy!" - "I do not see this as a big problem, but the new text works for me"
Gert Doering -- APWG chair