Hi Alex, When RS has policy interpretation doubts we ask for feedback to the community via mailing lists or during the AP WG session at a RIPE meeting. In this specific case however it is not about policy interpretation, but about receiving the tools necessary to properly implement the community policy. For this reason we would prefer the requested guidance to be part of the RIPE document, which is the authoritative source of information for both the RIPE NCC and the LIR when a resource request is being evaluated. Best regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC On 11/7/14 11:28, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Hi Marco,
The impact analysis contains this phrase several times:
In order to implement this proposal, the RIPE NCC would need definite guidance from the RIPE communityŠ
What form would the RIPE NCC like this guidance to have?
There¹s a whole range of ways that the RIPE NCC can be ³guided", from informal hints during a RIPE Meeting social all the way to changes in the articles of association, and many steps in between ;)
Regards,
Alex Le Heux
On 2014-07-11, 10:21 , "Marco Schmidt" <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
Dear colleagues,
The draft document for the proposal described in 2014-03, "Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments" has been published. The impact analysis that was conducted for this proposal has also been published.
You can find the full proposal and the impact analysis at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03
and the draft document at:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2014-03/draft
We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments to address-policy-wg@ripe.net before 11 August 2014.
Regards,
Marco Schmidt Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC