On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm@linx.net> wrote:
… (I did read it all) …
The TL;DR is that I am now willing to withdraw my objection, but would
ask that you change the title to remove the words "No need", agree to
changes as to how this is presented externally, and to support further
work as part of a new PDP.
I think your point of view is very well expressed, and even sensible.
I think your suggestion for going forward is constructive, and will probably mitigate the risk you highlighted from the impact analysis.
I don't know what the proper procedure would be for handling this, but you've got my support.