Hi, On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:33:52AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
F. Discussion of open policy proposals 50 min (more specifically: presentation on the status of the open policy proposals and Q&A, discussion will take place on the list)
2015-04 RIPE Resource Transfer Policies Erik Bais
2016-03 Locking Down the Final /8 Policy Remco van Mook
2016-04 (to be announced)
Some "heads up" on this one. We used to take our time to discuss these proposals in depth, and I still think that this is a valuable use of our time. Nevertheless, we've seriously overrun the meeting slots last time, something which is hard to avoid if there are a number of "open discussion" blocks on the list (and I do not want to cut off a productive discussion right in the middle). So, what we'll do this time for "item F" is: - presentation - Q&A - which is really "I do not understand that aspect, please explain?" and not "I do not like this, can you please change ...?" - "show of hands" quick feedback about the direction the proposal should take ("move forward" vs. "opposition") detailed discussion and consensus finding takes place on the list. The *other* items marked with "discussion" need the discussion time at the meeting, because these are not proposals *yet*, and we need more direct input to decide whether to move to a specific proposal, or abandon the idea(s). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279