10 Jul
2015
10 Jul
'15
3:48 p.m.
Hi Tore,
-----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Tore Anderson
I'll note that both authors' LIRs (uk.mod and de.kaufland) already hold an IPv6 /29 allocation each...so assuming the proposal was intended to help scratch an itch of their own, so to speak, perhaps this is simply an omission?
It was our (uk.mod's) expectation/assumption that it would be possible to return an existing allocation (in an 'unused/as-new' state) and apply for another under the new criteria. Regards, Mathew