4 Apr
2005
4 Apr
'05
12:10 p.m.
Hi,
The 200 thing can go indeed.
I completely agree.
The /48, which is the minimum assignment towards that endsite must stay. Otherwise there will be ISP's who are going to give out /56's, /58's, /60's, /62's etc.
This I am not so sure about. Fixing the assignment size on /48 makes the structure of address allocations and assignments very clear, but I am not sure if we should make this official policy or just a recommendation. I don't see a problem with assigning a /48 to a customer, but maybe this should be the decision of the LIR... - Sander.