On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
Because the original text required that the assignments are made to the *other* organizations. By all logic, only the assignments to the others should count.
In any case, your own infrastructure shouldn't take more than a /48 or something like that, so it wouldn't be useful to count it either: 199 or 200 makes no difference -- this would become bad if you could just assign e.g. /38 to your own infrastructure and state you've already assigned worth of 200 /48's.
See the email from Amar. Also, if you have several operating companies you might want to have separate assignments for each of them.
I saw that -- but I don't see *any* justification for this interpretation. Remember, the goal is to require 200 assignments to *other* organizations, not be satisfied that you can make 200 assignemnts to your internal network, or 100 assignments to your internal network and 100 to other organizations! -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings