Hi,
> A new RIPE Policy proposal, 2019-06, "Multiple Editorial Changes in IPv6 Policy"
> is now available for discussion.
>
> This proposal aims to remove obsoleted text and simplify the IPv6 policy.
I think this is a sensible update. Support.
Cheers,
Sander
I support the update, but have a question that I hope leads to a possible further clarification;
In section 5.4.2 is an end site intended to be an end-user at a single physical location, or the entirety of an end-user organization, that may exist in many locations or on a large multi-building campus, and therefore might easily justify an assignment shorter than /48.
I agree it is difficult to imagine a single physical location needing more than a /48. On the other hand, a large multi-site organization, say with hundreds of locations or hundreds of buildings on a single campus can easily need a prefix significantly shorter than /48. Further, it seems like a waste of resources to have RIPE or a NIR review shorter prefix assignments when made for multi-site organizations or large campuses.
Further, the definition of "End Site" doesn't really add much clarity to this question.