Why does this proposal say it's for DNS only? I guess other anycast protocols aren't important enough? j -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: 25. april 2007 16:52 To: Nick Hilliard Cc: Gert Doering; address-policy-wg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-02 New Policy Proposal (Change in IP Assignments for Anycasting DNS Policy) Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:44:26PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Well, yes-and-no. 2007-01 is only IPv6, while [...] 2007-01 applies to ipv4, ipv6 and as numbers.
Sorry. I got all confused with the IPv6 PI proposal (which is 200*6*-01). However, my primary comment still stands :-) - if we end up having IPv6 PI, we can do away with most of the special-case IPv6 policies. Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279