I’ve one comment in the Q&A before the session was closed: From experience: It is true that being more generic in policy text will be better (and it is reflected in the analysis impact), but some times this works clearly against the needs of the community, because then the NCC has too strict interpretations of the text. We have seen this in the IPv6 allocation several times! So properly balancing it is the difficulty. I then realized a mistake on my text … and corrected part of it: "a small mistake in my previous text. what I wanted to say about analysis impacts is that sometimes they work against being generic in the policy text" By the way, it will be good that before closing the session, specially when there is time, we pay attention to the Q&A, otherwise, remote participation is not efficient. This is the third time that I’ve this issue in RIPE meetings ... Regards, Jordi @jordipalet ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.