On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Marco Schmidt <mschmidt@ripe.net> wrote:
A proposed change to RIPE Document ripe-606, "IPv4 Address Allocation
and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region", is now
available for discussion.
On one hand, I don't quite see why the current requirement for IPv6 PA is there, and therefore it seems obvious that having IPv6 PI should be a valid requirement as well.
On the other hand, if any proposal ever had the look of rearranging deck chairs, this seems like it.
So I'm a bit on the fence here, awaiting further discussion to see what I haven't thought about – you, my colleagues here, always seem to think of and speak of such things.