Hi, On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:41:51PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
To put it differently: Why does anyone who considers IPv4 legacy care about how it's used up?
Well, I *do* care about the way we use the community's resources in policy building. If everybody gets exhausted doing a new round of IPv4 PI policy every time the "we do IPv4 PI only until <x> happens, and then no more!" mark is reached, other policy proposals do not get the attention they deserve. (By which I'd ask you to please stay away from a PI policy that will do things like "but only in the first /9 of the last /8, not in the second /9" - *iff* the community decides to bring back IPv4 PI, then let's do it for good and for all the remaining space. Doing it for "but not for the last /x" is exactly what we have now - let's not do *that* again). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279