5 May
2014
5 May
'14
10:02 p.m.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
If that PI assignment is already in use, a requirement to renumber and return it might be a showstopper for getting PA space. Renumbering is *hard* - it is *a lot* of work.
As the guy who renumbered a /17 in a few months: Yes. Oh my $deity... yes.
So while I don't think 2014-04 is harmful in any way and I don't have any objections to it, I do find it quite puzzling that it does not try to fix the actual problem in ripe-589 section 7.1 - which, if 2014-04 were to pass, would remain just as «downright deleterious to IPv6 adoption» as before.
I would also support such a proposal or maybe even help spearhead it. ...Tore? Richard