11 Jun
2004
11 Jun
'04
8:30 p.m.
On 11 Jun, 2004, at 16:55, Andreas Bäß/Denic wrote:
Don't you think the policy ought to be more relaxed and allow the server manager for the zone to decide how many of their servers they want to anycast?
i think the point intended is that the address space *must* be used for anycast, and not just another address grab. yes?
Well, no one doubts that is the intention here, that is why I suggested a different wording earlier, so the motivation is clear. My question is, why limit it to anycast one of the servers?
Can you help me and explain what the advantage of offering multiple anycast servers in comparison to a single anycast server is?
You put your eggs in more baskets. Joao